題:
排氣的目的是什麼?
George
2016-06-15 23:48:41 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

I was thinking today, what is the actual point of an exhaust?

Why can't we just have a pipe going out the front of a car instead of taking all the gases to the back of the car?

I can only see disadvantages of the current design:

  • The expense of manufacturing a long metal pipe, which has to be the length of the car. It would be a lot cheaper to make it come out at the front or the side

  • More to repair. Loads of old cars have leaking exhausts, and are always a nightmare to find and are expensive to fix. It would be easier to move the exhaust to the side or front and shorten it

  • Added weight means more fuel consumption

  • Repairing damage from going over speed humps at speed, loads of them round here have scrapes from exhausts on.

As everyone always asks what things are, here is a speed hump (shamelessly stolen from Wikipedia):

enter image description here

What are the points of exhausts?

Why can't we just let the gases out into the engine compartment, or out the front or side of the engine?

If we can't let them into the engine compartment, why can't we just let it out at the side of the car, instead of at the back?

“排氣的目的是什麼?” ...煙霧從後面排出。 (對不起,無法抗拒!)
除了已經提供的出色答案之外,您是否聽說過只有排氣歧管的汽車行駛?閒置時,這就像一堆大聲shot彈槍。
@MonkeyZeus:更不用說如果使用開放式歧管運行,則有吸入冷空氣並可能使排氣門變形的風險。
@TMN我沒有考慮,很高興知道!
速度駝峰圖片的意義是什麼?
@Nayuki迫使人們放慢腳步。
因為我是英國人,並且此網站上的很多人都是美國人,所以對於每種事物,通常都有不同的用詞。只是想擺脫任何混亂!
七 答案:
Becuzz
2016-06-16 00:12:16 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

Safety, comfort, noise and space are the things that come to mind.

Safety

Exhaust gasses are hot as hell. Hot enough that we put heat shields all over the exhaust line. In engines, we are actively trying to remove heat. Adding more from the exhaust goes completely against that and would increase overheating. Also, would you want a hot exhaust pipe near your door, nicely exposed for you to brush a leg against when getting out? I don't.

Comfort

If the exhaust came out the front or the side, you would be far more likely to breathe in your own exhaust, either through an open window or the ventilation system. No thanks.

Noise

We need to put a muffler somewhere. The space near the engine is already being used pretty heavily. So you would either have to design something smaller or live without one. Since there are laws some places regarding having a muffler and creating excess noise, car manufacturers are going to put them on there so they can sell cars.

Space

As alluded to above, there are large components (muffler, catalytic converter) that need to go somewhere. And they don't fit up by the engine.

有了這些,您可能會想到舊的風冷式大眾汽車。我知道我小時候曾經在尾管上燒過自己。由於消音器和短管較小,因此這種小型發動機的聲音相當大。
很好的答案,尤其是因為我一半希望您的所有答案都只是說“ Becuzz”。
好答案。我認為煙霧應屬於安全類別。內燃煙霧的危害範圍從最壞情況下的致命有毒氣體(一氧化碳)到中度刺激性氣體(NOx,氮氧化物和HC的氧化物,未燃燒的汽油),以及在最佳情況下僅能驅散氧氣的氣體(二氧化碳) 。
除了噪音以外,汽車上的大多數噪音都來自排氣。如果這是在乘員耳朵的後方,則向後指向時,噪音將有效地位於汽車後面。如果在乘員面前,噪音會大得多。開車穿過隧道,窗戶開著,踩在踏板上。如果尾氣在乘員的耳朵前方,您聽到的那種刺耳的噪音將一直是現實。
長話短說:這就是為什麼-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pcRRk0msas
早在60年代末和70年代初,“側管”是一種流行的改進。這樣通過門下面的門檻板下方的管道排出了廢氣。我從來沒有聽說有人被燒過(儘管我想這確實發生了),但是我確實聽說過由於油從管道中吹出並塗上後輪而使汽車失去牽引力。
車廂內是否氣密?我不認為這是事實,因此廢氣可能不只是來自通風系統或窗戶。
the-wabbit
2016-06-16 03:28:32 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

好吧,我們 可以有一條從汽車前部伸出的管子,如下所示: tractor或更重的前身: enter image description here可以說,兩者的空氣動力學特性都不都是最佳的,但這是一種確定了空氣動力學的類似方法: piston engine plane其他設計(例如卡車)確實考慮了空氣動力學將排氣管放在相關正面的後面,並使排氣流向側面或上方排出。儘管我懷疑它的用處,但您甚至可能會在乘用車中看到它: Mazda 3 tuned with truck exhausts

所有這些情況的共同點在於,設計師有足夠的空間來以便將氣體從駕駛員/駕駛員的鼻子引導走。

您可能在大多數標準的工廠模型乘用車設計中都沒有這個特性。因此,必須以不同的方式解決該問題。從工程師的角度來看,情況更加惡化,您將不得不適應廢氣處理設施和消音器某處,而諸如DPF / SCR系統(柴油機廢氣清潔)之類的裝置將佔用大量空間。自己的: SCR catalyst

好一個!歡迎來到該網站。歡呼加+1。
我不同意火車引擎是農田拖拉機的“前身”。
LRO-蒸汽機通向蒸汽拖拉機,然後引向我們今天所知的拖拉機。但是,即使沒有,您的評論實際上也沒有建設性。
@LightnessRacesinOrbit:正如羅里(Rory)所言,火車引擎實際上是現代拖拉機的前身(換句話說,是早期拖拉機的前身):http://historylink101.com/lessons/farm-city/early_farm_tractors.htm
@RoryAlsop:最近出現的這種“非建設性”時尚是什麼?對評論中的陳述提出批評是什麼“沒有建設性的”?從字面上看,這就是評論部分的用途。無需如此防禦。
@RoryAlsop:“您應該刪除有關火車是農田拖拉機的前身的說法”是有建設性的,但我不能同意這將對現有評論有所改善。
-1
@LightnessRacesinOrbit,我同意您的評論具有建設性,但如果您提供理由說明您的不同意,那麼它會更加有意義。無論哪種方式,我們大多數人都會感謝您的貢獻,因此請繼續努力:
@MooseLucifer:謝謝,儘管在經歷了這種情況之後,我可能會避免在此站點上這樣做!
vini_i
2016-06-16 00:09:44 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

幾件事;

  1. 從前面出來的排氣很危險。如果將煙霧吸入駕駛室,可能會傷害駕駛員。通常,汽車會向前行駛。如果廢氣從後部排出,則煙氣進入駕駛室的可能性最小。
  2. 消音器是大型組件。發動機艙內通常沒有足夠的空間容納它們。
  3. 排氣聲嘶啞。背部的長途旅行使它變涼了。沒有人會想要一輛汽車,如果您路過,就會被燒死。
  4. ol>
Damien
2016-06-16 12:33:03 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

The exhaust also creates a pressure differential, which can help scavenge exhaust gases from the chamber. So a properly tuned exhaust will therefore increase the fuel efficiency of the engine. Whilst an engine without an exhaust would make more power, it would also consume more fuel.

確實。離開發動機的氣體具有足夠的動量,可以在恰好合適的時間與下一個排氣循環同時引起輕微的壓力下降,從而有助於從隨後的排氣沖程中排出廢氣。調整良好的排氣系統可以顯著提高發動機效率和功率輸出。
Shobin P
2016-06-16 13:31:24 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

Adding to the excellent answers already given.

  • An important point to note is that we need to have a catalytic converter somewhere in the exhaust a short exhaust will not have room to fit it.

Then there are a host of other things car manufacturers determine while designing an exhaust system.

For an engine to have optimum efficiency, the intake , combustion and exhaust systems have to be tuned together as a single entity. The exhaust is more than a stupid long steel pipe at the end of the exhaust manifold. It CONTRIBUTES to the performance of the engine.

Within the exhaust itself there are various parameters like the length, the width or the diameter etc which determine a host of factors.

For example, if you want a setup with low end power and good efficiency , you will have to go for a traditional long exhaust, if you want a race setup a short exhaust is preferred.

So for any car you drive , the exhaust pipe characteristics are carefully adjusted and tuned according to the purpose of the car , now in 90% of the commuter cars , the performance factor takes a back seat and economy and comfort come in first , thus the long exhaust till the tail.

Now , one can argue that if length of the exhaust affects the performance then why do super cars have long exhausts? Reason? to stick to Sound and emissions standards.

Mark Petereit
2016-06-16 18:05:26 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

Take that airplane with the short, up-front, direct exhaust pipes. Start it up in your driveway early on a Saturday morning. See how popular you are with your neighbors.

歡迎光臨本站!自從OP首先問這個問題以來,我一直在想,他們不了解直管的聲音有多大,因此他們不會理解您對答案的暗示。如果您可以詳細說明為什麼自己不會那麼受歡迎,那麼這將是一個很好的答案。感謝您的貢獻!
idarwin
2016-06-18 18:15:01 UTC
view on stackexchange narkive permalink

因為已經指出,地獄式內燃機具有危險的副產品-熱和有毒氣體以及噪音-需要從使用車輛的人身上帶走。一個世紀前,社會做出了一個錯誤的選擇,而我們生活在今天的後果中。買一輛電動汽車,您永遠不必更換排氣/尾氣管。但是,您仍然必須注意減速帶。

歡迎來到該網站。感謝您在這裡。儘管您不必更換排氣管/尾氣管,但在電動汽車中,電池的更換時間大約相同。與僅更換排氣系統相比,對環境造成的後果要大得多。雖然這個答案令人讚賞,但它肯定比起可以幫助OP或回答問題的東西更像是語。


該問答將自動從英語翻譯而來。原始內容可在stackexchange上找到,我們感謝它分發的cc by-sa 3.0許可。
Loading...